Popular Posts
-
The first phone to run Android 2.3 Gingerbread which unlike their predecessor who only runs on Android 2.2, Google proudly claims Nexus S as...
-
coolstuffs: Nexus S: The Best Android Phone : "The first phone to run Android 2.3 Gingerbread which unlike their predecessor who only r...
-
The world's leading mobile phone maker Nokia said Tuesday it was filing a fresh complaint against Apple for patent infringement ...
Tuesday, February 15, 2011
coolstuffs: Nexus S: The Best Android Phone
coolstuffs: Nexus S: The Best Android Phone: "The first phone to run Android 2.3 Gingerbread which unlike their predecessor who only runs on Android 2.2, Google proudly claims Nexus S as..."
Nexus S: The Best Android Phone
The first phone to run Android 2.3 Gingerbread which unlike their predecessor who only runs on Android 2.2, Google proudly claims Nexus S as the best Android Phone. “Pure Google” That’s the tagline Google is using to promote the Nexus S. The Nexus S’s distribution strategy is more conventional. It’ll be sold at Best Buy for $199 with a two-year T-Mobile contract or $599 with no commitment. The 4-inches screen size is just right which makes it noticeably roomy. The screen uses AMOLED technology, which makes for vivid colors and deep blacks. Another Nexus S feature, its support for a technology known as near-field communications (NFC), it lets the phone communicate wirelessly with other NFC-equipped objects that are no more than 4 inches away. Setting up the phone doesn’t involve much more than entering your Google account name and password, Android then automatically configures services such as Gmail and Google Calendar.
Google Nexus S and iPhone 4-Comparison
The most obvious and important difference between these two elite smartphones is the exterior. While the Nexus S looks pretty elegant with its rounded and curved case, the iPhone 4 has more of an industrial look and feel, which may put off some people. The Nexus S actually looks more like the older iPhone 3GS than the new iPhone. The difference in size is negligible, though the iPhone 4 is smaller overall at 115.2×58.6×9.3 mm, but taking into consideration the bigger 4 inch display on the Nexus S, its 123.9x63x10.9 mm aren’t that much of a difference, and it actually makes it feel better in your hand.
Display
Both the iPhone 4 and Nexus S have beautiful screens, but there are a few important differences between them. The iPhone 4 has a 3.5 inch unit with an amazing resolution of 960×640, making it the most pixel packed display on any smartphone. The picture is simply incredible – very crisp and clear. The only bad thing is that the LCD backlight limits the potential contrast and it’s very hard to read the text on the screen in its normal size on a website from a distance of more than 5-10 inches
The processor, video adapter and RAM type and amount are the same on both the Nexus S and the iPhone 4. The Nexus S has the Samsung Hummingbird 1 GHz ARM Cortex-A8 CPU coupled with a PowerVR SGX540 video graphics adapter and 512 MB of RAM, which should provide enough performance for any task for years to come.
Monday, February 14, 2011
WiTricity - Wireless Electricity
Our forefathers marveled at the invention of glowing light bulbs by
Thomas Edison in 1879. However, to us 21st centurions, the light
bulb is nothing out of the ordinary. When computers, cellphones,
laptops, iPods, etc. were invented our antennas tweaked. Now this is
what you call invention! However, as time's progressing we are
getting used to these devices. In fact, charging all these appliances
has become so very cumbersome.
Thomas Edison in 1879. However, to us 21st centurions, the light
bulb is nothing out of the ordinary. When computers, cellphones,
laptops, iPods, etc. were invented our antennas tweaked. Now this is
what you call invention! However, as time's progressing we are
getting used to these devices. In fact, charging all these appliances
has become so very cumbersome.
What is WiTricity
WiTricity is nothing but wireless electricity. Transmission of electrical
energy from one object to another without the use of wires is called
as WiTricity. WiTricity will ensure that the cellphones, laptops, iPods
and other power hungry devices get charged on their own, eliminating
the need of plugging them in. Even better, because of WiTricity some
of the devices won't require batteries to operate.
What's the Principle behind WiTricity
WiTricity - Wireless Electricity, these words are simpler said than
done. The concept behind this fascinating term is a little complex.
However, if you want to understand it, try and picture what I state in
the next few lines. Consider two self resonating copper coils of same
resonating frequency with a diameter 20 inches each. One copper
wire is connected to the power source (WiTricity transmitter), while
the other copper wire is connected to the device (WiTricity Receiver).
The Brain behind WiTricity
Prof. Marin Soljacic from Massachusetts Institute of Technology
(MIT), is the one who has proved that magnetic coupled resonance
can be utilized in order to transfer energy without wires. What's even
more interesting is how he came about this idea.
Why was WiTricity not Developed before?
It is often said 'necessity is the best teacher' and can be applied in
this case as well. Only in this century, has the need for wireless
electricity emerged so rapidly, spearheaded by the agony caused by
the cumbersome charging of endless devices. Earlier people didn't
need it, so they didn't think about it.
What's the Future of WiTricity
MIT's WiTricity is only 40 to 45% efficient and according to Soljacic,
they have to be twice as efficient to compete with the traditional
chemical batteries. The team's next aim is to get a robotic vacuum or
a laptop working, charging devices placed anywhere in the room and
even robots on factory floors. The researchers are also currently
working on the health issues related to this concept and have said
that in another three to five years time, they will come up with a
WiTricity system for commercial use.
Applications
The concept can be used to lighten the weight of an Formula 1 car and reduce expenditure on lightening of an aircraft using no wires and many more.....
Friday, February 11, 2011
The Anti-Facebook Revolution
Face-to-Facebook is a project by Paolo Cirio and Alessandro Ludovico. The two artists stole one million Facebook profiles, filtered them through face-recognition software, selected their 250,000 favorites, grouped them by facial expression (smug, climber, funny, easy-going etc.) and uploaded them to a custom-made dating website, Lovely Faces.
Facebook is too crowded to be a home, claim Cirio and Ludovico, and too familiar to be a street. It's an "eternal, illusory party." And they decided to crash it.
Face-to-Facebook
Facebook sent a message too - a cease-and-desist letter - because the artists (activists, pirates, assholes) had raided their data.
Mark Zuckerberg knows exactly how wrong this is, having pillaged Harvard's system back in the day to create his Facebook prototype, FaceMash.
Facebook's privacy controversy last year piqued the collective consciousness about online security. On Facebook and many other sites, we re-embody ourselves through data and surrender our data bodies to the powers that be.
A lot of people find this terrifying and a lot of people don't. A lot of people care, but aren't sure why and a lot of people don't care and aren't sure why. I, for one, while not so perturbed, also know that future me is often disappointed by present me's decision-making. I am therefore withholding judgment.
But Google hasn't.
Facebook Resistance is plotting the insurrection. The plan is to scramble the website's homogenized layout, which tidied the messiness and creativity of a Geocities or a Myspace into a 2.0 repository of economically valuable data.
"It's like if everyone's living room had the same Ikea furniture," said Tobias Leingruber, the artist spearheading Facebook Resistance.
Already one million people, Leingruber claims, have downloaded the plug-in and "disliking" is part of their Facebook reality.
Other viral acts of vandalism in the works include custom wallpapers, a gender spectrum slider, the ability to list multiple romantic partners and to manically graffiti your friend's wall.
Some of the ideas are political, while others are as pointed as a kid with a crayon. But the idea is to restore fundamental principles that Facebook, and other sites like it, threaten: The importance of being anyone and not just someone, and of taking control of your online identity, before someone comes along and tags you as "smug."
Facebook is too crowded to be a home, claim Cirio and Ludovico, and too familiar to be a street. It's an "eternal, illusory party." And they decided to crash it.
Face-to-Facebook
Facebook sent a message too - a cease-and-desist letter - because the artists (activists, pirates, assholes) had raided their data.
Mark Zuckerberg knows exactly how wrong this is, having pillaged Harvard's system back in the day to create his Facebook prototype, FaceMash.
Facebook's privacy controversy last year piqued the collective consciousness about online security. On Facebook and many other sites, we re-embody ourselves through data and surrender our data bodies to the powers that be.
A lot of people find this terrifying and a lot of people don't. A lot of people care, but aren't sure why and a lot of people don't care and aren't sure why. I, for one, while not so perturbed, also know that future me is often disappointed by present me's decision-making. I am therefore withholding judgment.
But Google hasn't.
Facebook Resistance is plotting the insurrection. The plan is to scramble the website's homogenized layout, which tidied the messiness and creativity of a Geocities or a Myspace into a 2.0 repository of economically valuable data.
"It's like if everyone's living room had the same Ikea furniture," said Tobias Leingruber, the artist spearheading Facebook Resistance.
Already one million people, Leingruber claims, have downloaded the plug-in and "disliking" is part of their Facebook reality.
Other viral acts of vandalism in the works include custom wallpapers, a gender spectrum slider, the ability to list multiple romantic partners and to manically graffiti your friend's wall.
Some of the ideas are political, while others are as pointed as a kid with a crayon. But the idea is to restore fundamental principles that Facebook, and other sites like it, threaten: The importance of being anyone and not just someone, and of taking control of your online identity, before someone comes along and tags you as "smug."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)